Validation of a framework for evaluating knowledge mobilization strategies: A Delphi method approach.

Authors

  • Saliha Ziam Université Téluq
  • Sèverine Lanoue Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
  • Esther McSween-Cadieux Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
  • Quan Nha Hong Université de Montréal, Canada
  • Julie Lane Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
  • Ollivier Prigent Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.
  • Christian Dagenais Université de Montréal, Canada
  • Valery Ridde Université Paris Cité
  • Emmanuelle Jean Public health intelligence and knowledge translation division
  • Mathieu-Joël Gervais Université du Québec à Montréal, UQAM
  • France Charles Fleury Interregional Consortium of Knowledge in Health and Social Services

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34190/eckm.24.2.1642

Keywords:

knowledge moblization; knowledge translation;, Framework, validation, Delphi Method

Abstract

Background: A growing number of knowledge-oriented organizations, such as granting agencies, governments, public organizations, universities, and health authorities, are investing considerable resources to increase the use of research knowledge to improve professional practice, decision making, and public policy. The proliferation of research on knowledge mobilization (KMb) over the past two decades has deepened our understanding of the dynamics of this process and of the factors that can impede its deployment, such as knowledge users’ capabilities (their beliefs, capacity to absorb knowledge, etc.), contextual conditions (resources, leadership, facilitating factors, etc.), and the availability of effective mobilization strategies (frequency, implementation, fit with context). However, yet, few good-quality studies have evaluated the impacts of KMb, such that we still know too little about the effectiveness of the different strategies and the contextual conditions in which they may be effective. This is problematic, in that their development cannot be fully grounded in empirical evidence. In fact, their evaluation is complicated by the virtual absence of evaluation tools and validated indicators that would allow organizations to assess the impacts of their KMb strategies. Moreover, the difficulty that these organizations experience in relation to evaluation (due to lack of expertise and resources) is a concern that has been raised many times. Aims:  This study will address this expressed need to improve organizations’ capacity to conduct KMb evaluation studies. Using a collaborative co-construction approach with key actors in KMb, our aim is to design and validate an integrative and operational framework for the evaluation of KMb strategies in the social domain. Design/approach: a first step in this project, we conducted a scoping review of frameworks and theories commonly used to evaluate KMb strategies. 71 articles were selected from this scoping review. Our analyses of these articles, we identified four potentially relevant dimensions for planning and evaluation: the context, implementation process, effects, and impacts of these strategies. Using the Delphi approach, a consultation has been undertaken to enrich and validate the dimensions of this framework developed after a scoping review. Results: This paper presents the results of the Delphi consultation with an international panel of experts working in the field of knowledge mobilization. This evaluation exercise should lead to a validation of the framework components and potential indicators to be considered when evaluating knowledge mobilization strategies.

 

Author Biographies

Saliha Ziam, Université Téluq

School of Business Administration, Université TÉLUQ, Montréal, Canada.

Sèverine Lanoue, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada

Department of School and Social Adaptation Studies, Faculty of Education, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada

Esther McSween-Cadieux, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.

Department of School and Social Adaptation Studies, Faculty of Education, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.

Quan Nha Hong, Université de Montréal, Canada

School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.

Julie Lane, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada

Department of School and Social Adaptation Studies, Faculty of Education, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.

Ollivier Prigent, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.

Department of School and Social Adaptation Studies, Faculty of Education, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada.

Valery Ridde, Université Paris Cité

Université Paris Cité, IRD (Institute for Research on Sustainable Development, CEPED, Paris, France.

Emmanuelle Jean, Public health intelligence and knowledge translation division

Senior Knowledge Broker for Public Health Agency of Canada, Public health intelligence and knowledge translation division

Mathieu-Joël Gervais, Université du Québec à Montréal, UQAM

Department of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Cana

France Charles Fleury, Interregional Consortium of Knowledge in Health and Social Services

Coordinator of the Interregional Consortium of Knowledge in Health and Social Services (InterS4), Rimouski, Canada

Downloads

Published

2023-09-05