Student Ambassadors for Sustainable AI EdTech Knowledge Sharing in Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34190/ecel.25.1.5455Keywords:
Representational quality, AI EdTech, sustainable knowledge sharing, student ambassadors, knowledge mobilisationAbstract
This conceptual paper develops a framework for appraising institutional knowledge assets produced through AI EdTech dissemination. Knowledge mobilisation research emphasises dissemination, interpretation, usefulness, uptake and context, but does not typically isolate representational quality as a distinct asset-level appraisal dimension. This gap is especially consequential when verification asymmetry and promotional incentive co-occur: claims may exceed inspectable evidence, overstate attribution or omit material conditions and risks even when assets remain visible, accessible and reusable. The paper therefore conceptualises representational quality through four criteria: claim traceability, attribution restraint, condition disclosure and risk representation. It further specifies a student ambassador model in which case-linked direct-user knowledge is combined with evidence access, expert review and revision rights across a governed production-and-maintenance lifecycle. Production-stage verification constrains distortion before dissemination, while post-hoc fidelity audit supports correction after publication; engagement analytics substitute for neither. Five falsifiable propositions address construct distinctness, verification, direct-user informational advantage, conditional diagnostic value and maintenance after material change. The paper reports no empirical findings. Its contribution is to position representational quality as an explicit property of AI EdTech knowledge assets and to specify the conditions and governance mechanisms under which it should be appraised.