Beyond AI: How Business Simulations Preserve Human-Centric Learning

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34190/ecel.24.1.3815

Keywords:

e-learning, simulation, higher education, sustainability, game-based learning, interactive learning, educational gamification

Abstract

As artificial intelligence becomes more integrated into higher education, it is increasingly capable of supporting decision-making, modelling complex systems, and accelerating technical learning. While these capabilities are welcomed and offer learning opportunities for students, AI does not account for dimensions of human learning, or the development of human-centric skills. This human-centric learning is essential for cultivating collaborative, responsible, and reflective graduates. Therefore, value must be placed on the intentional development of both technical and human-centric learning to complement each other in the age of AI. This study employs a qualitative methodology through the thematic analysis of 45 student reflections from a postgraduate business simulation module to investigate how business simulation promotes technical learning while preserving human-centric learning. Using a thematic coding framework, the study categorises learning into human-centric themes and assesses each for its replicability by AI. The findings highlight that while simulation integrated AI-enhanced tools (i.e. forecasting dashboards and scenario rewinds) aided student learning, the most meaningful learning described by students focuses on human-centric dimensions - resilience, collaboration, ethical reasoning, and reflective insight, and not on algorithmic optimisation through AI. The findings reveal that while AI enhances learning, it cannot replicate the emotional, ethical, and relational growth students undergo when confronting uncertainty, navigating team dynamics, and learning from failure. The paper argues for a pedagogical approach that defends and designs for human-centric learning - particularly in fields where leadership and judgment development are core. As education evolves alongside AI, it becomes essential to clarify not only what AI can do, but what it must not replace.

Author Biographies

Michael P. O'Brien, University of Limerick

Dr. Michael P. O’Brien is Associate Professor of Information Management at the Kemmy Business School, University of Limerick, Ireland. He teaches on undergraduate and postgraduate modules in the area of Information and Knowledge Management. His research interests include learning analytics, game-based learning, cognitive and educational psychology, software comprehension strategies, empirical studies of programmers and software evolution.

Yvonne Costin, University of Limerick

Dr. Yvonne Costin is Associate Professor of Entrepreneurship at the Kemmy Business School, University of Limerick, Ireland. In her role, Yvonne teaches entrepreneurship, enterprise formation and development, and small business consulting. Dr. Costin works with undergraduate, postgraduate and executive students encouraging them to explore their own entrepreneurial potential, aligning closely with her strong research interest in entrepreneurship education, and various pedagogical approaches to teaching entrepreneurship across various disciplines.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-17